I have been trying to use Twitter as often as possible over the last couple of weeks. While it's fun to read what people are doing and be directed to new and exciting sites, I'm not entirely sure if people like me are the best people to be using Twitter. All together I've had 46 updates, and 34 of them were since March 1st.
I am following 28 people. These people are friends, family members, Augie Ray, BigShoes, Telie and everyone that has come and talked to our class. So far, I have 25 followers.
I find that people in the "real world" are more interesting than people my age. I feel if my entire network consisted of people my age Tweeting about what they did today, I wouldn't be as interested in Twitter. A lot of times I felt like I didn't really have anything worthy to say. My Tweets consisted of "watching the game today!" or "Happy St. Patrick's Day!" So, a majority of my posts were about my thoughts and whereabouts. I did re-tweet a few interesting things I found from other people, but I didn't want all of my posts to be re-tweets. I re-tweeted SocialMedia411 because I find their tweets really interesting. I also thought their tweets were the most relevant to what our class is all about.
I also used Twitter to try and promote PRSSA meetings, but I don't think it really worked.
I do enjoy using Twitter now but I feel like I will be able to contribute more once I get a job and have more important information to pass along.
I think it's still important for people like me to have Twitter because we are the people that businesses and organizations are trying to reach.
I think one of my favorites to follow is Marquette. I get many e-mails a day and don't always take the time to read my news briefs but when I come on Twitter I can see what's happening on campus right away.
I have benefited from using Twitter because it has allowed me to form contacts with people. When a speaker would come to our class I would quickly look them up and begin to follow them. This allowed me to see what they were up to even after they left the classroom. If I didn't have Twitter I would most likely never hear about or even remember the people who came in and talked to our class. Twitter is a great way to maintain connections that otherwise would have been lost. This aspect would have to be my most positive experience in using Twitter.
My most negative experience with using Twitter would have to be the fact that I don't believe I have anything exciting to say. When I see that I have a new follower I always think to myself "why would they want to follow me?" Hopefully my job this summer will allow me gain more "real world" experience within public relations, and then I'll have more to Tweet about! For now I think I'll remain somewhat of a spectator.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Saturday, March 14, 2009
The New Facebook
Since I was on vacation all last week, I did not have time to really go on the computer. I just got back and decided to check my Facebook only to notice that the layout and format of it has changed quite a bit. I didn't really find it all that shocking because Facebook seems to do this every so often. What did shock me was that this new Facebook layout reminds me a lot of Twitter.
Facebook's new homepage has a welcome note that says, "You're looking at the real-time stream of posts from your friends and connections." This is exactly what Twitter is. The cool thing about Facebook though is that you can see a real-time stream of not only your friends updates but their pictures, videos, and much more.
Why do you think Facebook changes the layout do often? Is it to keep this "older" form of social media new and exciting?
The fact that Facebook has become like Twitter makes me think that Facebook is trying to keep up with other forms of social media that are becoming popular.
I would also like to know how people feel about the new Facebook? I kind of like it. I think it's cool how you can sort through and filter through what you want to see on the left hand side of the home page.
Facebook's new homepage has a welcome note that says, "You're looking at the real-time stream of posts from your friends and connections." This is exactly what Twitter is. The cool thing about Facebook though is that you can see a real-time stream of not only your friends updates but their pictures, videos, and much more.
Why do you think Facebook changes the layout do often? Is it to keep this "older" form of social media new and exciting?
The fact that Facebook has become like Twitter makes me think that Facebook is trying to keep up with other forms of social media that are becoming popular.
I would also like to know how people feel about the new Facebook? I kind of like it. I think it's cool how you can sort through and filter through what you want to see on the left hand side of the home page.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Groundswell Profile Tool
I decided to play around with the Groundswell Social Profile Tool, but I did not find exactly what I thought I would find. I compared females from the US and all different ages. What I expected to find in the 18-24 age group was what I expected. Many (77-78%) of these women are spectators and joiners, which is what I thought a majority of this age group would be. I thought this way because many women in this age group are just being introduced to the many different forms of social media. This means that they have not had a lot of time to become creators. I was surprised that 51% were already critics. I expect that the women in this group are on the older side of the age range. It was also interesting to see that only 10% were inactives.
In the 25-34 age group I expected to see much more critics and creators and less spectators and inactives. I thought this would occur because many women in this age group have established a career where they would probably use some form of social media. I was wrong. Only 27% of these women were creators and critics dropped down to 40%. The largest of this age group were spectators with 72%. An explanation for this may be because many women in this age group have settled down and have families to look after. This may also explain why men in this same age group have a slightly higher percentage of creators.
Overall, this is a great tool to see where people in our society (and other societies) are with social media. I would love to see where the numbers are 5 to 10 years from now. I suspect that the number of critics and creators will greatly increase and the number of inactives will greatly decrease.
In the 25-34 age group I expected to see much more critics and creators and less spectators and inactives. I thought this would occur because many women in this age group have established a career where they would probably use some form of social media. I was wrong. Only 27% of these women were creators and critics dropped down to 40%. The largest of this age group were spectators with 72%. An explanation for this may be because many women in this age group have settled down and have families to look after. This may also explain why men in this same age group have a slightly higher percentage of creators.
Overall, this is a great tool to see where people in our society (and other societies) are with social media. I would love to see where the numbers are 5 to 10 years from now. I suspect that the number of critics and creators will greatly increase and the number of inactives will greatly decrease.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
